Filippo Valsorda
2dbfe9001f
The new code is meant to be readable without external references for Poly1305, and explains the field logic. The generic code is now 30-50% faster on a Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2690 v3 @ 2.60GHz, and even better on a 3.1 GHz i7 MacBook. name old time/op new time/op delta 64-48 126ns ± 0% 80ns ± 1% -36.24% (p=0.000 n=16+20) 1K-48 1.07µs ± 0% 0.81µs ± 2% -23.63% (p=0.000 n=19+20) 2M-48 2.07ms ± 0% 1.61ms ± 1% -22.31% (p=0.000 n=20+20) Write64-48 79.3ns ± 0% 58.0ns ± 1% -26.89% (p=0.000 n=20+19) Write1K-48 1.02µs ± 0% 0.79µs ± 1% -22.91% (p=0.000 n=19+19) Write2M-48 2.07ms ± 0% 1.61ms ± 2% -22.33% (p=0.000 n=17+20) name old speed new speed delta 64-48 508MB/s ± 0% 797MB/s ± 1% +56.95% (p=0.000 n=16+20) 1K-48 960MB/s ± 0% 1257MB/s ± 2% +30.94% (p=0.000 n=18+20) 2M-48 1.01GB/s ± 0% 1.30GB/s ± 1% +28.73% (p=0.000 n=20+20) Write64-48 807MB/s ± 0% 1104MB/s ± 1% +36.78% (p=0.000 n=18+19) Write1K-48 1.00GB/s ± 0% 1.30GB/s ± 1% +29.71% (p=0.000 n=18+19) Write2M-48 1.01GB/s ± 0% 1.31GB/s ± 2% +28.77% (p=0.000 n=17+20) The assembly is still 50-90% faster on the Xeon, 30-60% on the MacBook. The Go code does not use all the arithmetic tricks the assembly does, and it does not have access to the three operand wide shift instruction. name old time/op new time/op delta 64-48 80.3ns ± 1% 54.2ns ± 0% -32.50% (p=0.000 n=20+17) 1K-48 815ns ± 2% 446ns ± 1% -45.27% (p=0.000 n=20+20) 2M-48 1.61ms ± 1% 0.86ms ± 0% -46.54% (p=0.000 n=20+17) Write64-48 58.0ns ± 1% 34.0ns ± 0% -41.34% (p=0.000 n=19+20) Write1K-48 790ns ± 1% 427ns ± 0% -45.92% (p=0.000 n=19+17) Write2M-48 1.61ms ± 2% 0.86ms ± 0% -46.51% (p=0.000 n=20+20) name old speed new speed delta 64-48 797MB/s ± 1% 1180MB/s ± 0% +48.09% (p=0.000 n=20+19) 1K-48 1.26GB/s ± 2% 2.30GB/s ± 1% +82.71% (p=0.000 n=20+20) 2M-48 1.30GB/s ± 1% 2.44GB/s ± 0% +87.04% (p=0.000 n=20+17) Write64-48 1.10GB/s ± 1% 1.88GB/s ± 0% +70.52% (p=0.000 n=19+18) Write1K-48 1.30GB/s ± 1% 2.40GB/s ± 0% +84.84% (p=0.000 n=19+18) Write2M-48 1.31GB/s ± 2% 2.44GB/s ± 0% +86.93% (p=0.000 n=20+20) Hopefully this will also avoid the need for an arm64 implementation. Since now the Go and the amd64/ppc64le assembly use the same limb schedule, drop the assembly initialize and finalize implementations, and make the wrapper code match. It comes with a minor slowdown. name old time/op new time/op delta 64-48 50.3ns ± 0% 54.2ns ± 0% +7.73% (p=0.000 n=20+17) 1K-48 441ns ± 0% 446ns ± 1% +1.10% (p=0.000 n=19+20) 2M-48 860µs ± 0% 859µs ± 0% ~ (p=0.178 n=19+17) Write64-48 34.0ns ± 0% 34.0ns ± 0% ~ (all equal) Write1K-48 424ns ± 0% 427ns ± 0% +0.71% (p=0.000 n=17+17) Write2M-48 860µs ± 0% 859µs ± 0% -0.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20) name old speed new speed delta 64-48 1.27GB/s ± 0% 1.18GB/s ± 0% -7.20% (p=0.000 n=20+19) 1K-48 2.32GB/s ± 0% 2.30GB/s ± 1% -1.07% (p=0.000 n=18+20) 2M-48 2.44GB/s ± 0% 2.44GB/s ± 0% ~ (p=0.173 n=19+17) Write64-48 1.88GB/s ± 0% 1.88GB/s ± 0% +0.04% (p=0.000 n=19+18) Write1K-48 2.41GB/s ± 0% 2.40GB/s ± 0% -0.67% (p=0.000 n=19+18) Write2M-48 2.44GB/s ± 0% 2.44GB/s ± 0% +0.04% (p=0.000 n=19+20) Since poly1305/sum_generic.go was almost entirely rewritten, it's probably best reviewed on gitiles. This is the implementation published at https://blog.filippo.io/a-literate-go-implementation-of-poly1305/ Updates #31470 Change-Id: I74f9011d3ee317a43b05ae7f05d96081d08bffd3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/169037 Reviewed-by: Katie Hockman <katie@golang.org>
20 lines
517 B
Go
20 lines
517 B
Go
// Copyright 2015 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
|
|
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
|
|
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
// +build arm,!gccgo,!appengine,!nacl
|
|
|
|
package poly1305
|
|
|
|
// poly1305_auth_armv6 is implemented in sum_arm.s
|
|
//go:noescape
|
|
func poly1305_auth_armv6(out *[16]byte, m *byte, mlen uint32, key *[32]byte)
|
|
|
|
func sum(out *[16]byte, m []byte, key *[32]byte) {
|
|
var mPtr *byte
|
|
if len(m) > 0 {
|
|
mPtr = &m[0]
|
|
}
|
|
poly1305_auth_armv6(out, mPtr, uint32(len(m)), key)
|
|
}
|