Commit Graph
7 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
cuishuang 0997000b45 all: fix some comments
Change-Id: I0395c5db6edd7d90f9ec1dadbe881a77c906c732
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/713120
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Sean Liao <sean@liao.dev>
Reviewed-by: Sean Liao <sean@liao.dev>
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
2025-10-27 09:33:07 -07:00
Daniel McCarney 9d779377cf acme: include order problem in OrderError
If client.WaitOrder or client.CreateOrderCert return an acme.OrderError
it's helpful to include the order's problem field (if available). This
will often have detailed information about why a particular order
became invalid that's invaluable for debugging (e.g. a challenge
response was incorrect, a name couldn't be resolved, etc).

While it's possible for a consumer to poll the order themselves as part
of handling the order to extract a fresh Order.Error field value, it
would take an extra round-trip network request. Since we have the
underlying error in-hand when we produce the OrderError we might as well
include it directly.

Since this field is a structured object with a number of sub-fields the
OrderError.Error() function isn't updated to include the order problem
error in the String description. Interested callers should instead use
errors.Is to extract the problem information directly.

Resolves golang/go#74430

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:x_crypto-gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Change-Id: I3158f064793bbfdc292dd6b5e1a6bfd7729bd980
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/681037
Auto-Submit: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Pratt <mpratt@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Stapleton Cordasco <graffatcolmingov@gmail.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
2025-09-04 07:39:59 -07:00
Daniel McCarney b999374650 acme: fix pebble subprocess output data race
Wait for process completion before reading stdout/stderr buffers
to eliminate race between I/O Go routines and test cleanup.

Updates golang/go#74437

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:x_crypto-gotip-linux-amd64-longtest-race
Change-Id: I2e650c04db5be0d7a1e858ce40e25f13ad12223c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/693596
Auto-Submit: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
2025-08-06 13:33:03 -07:00
Daniel McCarney 1fda73153f acme: increase pebble test waitForServer attempts
In CI it seems that occasionally we can't connect to the test servers
within 10 tries, and the test flakes. Let's give the process more
attempts.

Updates golang/go#74437

Change-Id: I74d6cea83468a3a572ec4b52ff7314c778c664cf
Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:x_crypto-gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/692075
Auto-Submit: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Freeman <mark@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
2025-08-01 08:44:22 -07:00
Daniel McCarney b903b535d3 acme: capture pebble test subprocess stdout/stderr
When spawning the pebble and pebble-challtestserv processes redirect
stdout/stderr to bytes.Buffer instances and print their content at test
end as appropriate.

The stdout/stderr content for each process is printed if the test
failed, or if testing is being done in verbose mode. Otherwise the
output is swallowed.

This makes debugging test failures much easier as output from the
subprocesses from independent tests isn't intermingled.

Updates golang/go#74437

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:x_crypto-gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Change-Id: Ia79a3609ce3522ef6248442de247554c39367162
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/686935
Auto-Submit: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Amedee <carlos@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
2025-07-11 12:27:10 -07:00
Daniel McCarney b3790b8d91 acme: fix TLSALPN01ChallengeCert for IP address identifiers
When creating a TLS-ALPN-01 challenge response certificate for an IP
address identifier we need to configure the template IPAddresses field,
not the DNSNames/Subject.CommonName.

Along the way we can do some small tidying:
* Updating the draft TLS-ALPN-01 reference to the finalized RFC
* Adding a reference to the IP address identifier ACME RFC
* Adding a mention of the form the challenge validation request's SNI
  will take when verifying an IP address identifier
* Tidying the private tlsChallengeCert() function to take a single
  identifier as arg since the only call-sites provide singular values
  since the removal of the TLS-SNI-[01|02] challenge helpers.

This allows enabling an IP address identifier in the Pebble integration
tests that otherwise caused a validation failure for TLS-ALPN-01
challenge types because the IP address was used as a DNS SAN.

Updates golang/go#73914

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:x_crypto-gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Change-Id: Ic671e41b585f424f821db65206c7ffcc6dd386a0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/677576
Reviewed-by: Ian Stapleton Cordasco <graffatcolmingov@gmail.com>
Auto-Submit: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
2025-06-30 12:50:50 -07:00
Daniel McCarney 1dc4269656 acme: add Pebble integration testing
This commit adds integration test coverage for a complete TLS-ALPN-01
and HTTP-01 based issuance flow.

For each tested challenge type we:

* Spin up a pebble/pebble-challtestsrv environment
* Spin up a small challenge response server
* Create an ACME account
* Create an order for multiple DNS type identifiers
* Provision challenge responses based on the challenge type under test
* Wait for the order to become ready for issuance
* Finalize the order, issuing a certificate
* Check the newly issued certificate chain validates with the Pebble
  trust anchor, and that the certificate is valid for each of the names
  from our initial order

These tests are skipped in short mode (Pebble has variable delays for
validation requests).

The Pebble source is fetched through the Go module proxy (unless
a local directory is specified to aid development), similar to how the
stdlib crypto packages fetch BoGo tooling.

More test coverage for various other parts of the protocol (key
rollover, account/authz deactivation, revocation, etc) can be added as
follow-up work now that the groundwork for integration testing is laid.

Fixes golang/go#73914

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.golang.try:x_crypto-gotip-linux-amd64-longtest
Change-Id: I4e79f4858f31ef290a0c91d345e15fbdc510e9ab
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/677575
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
Auto-Submit: Daniel McCarney <daniel@binaryparadox.net>
Reviewed-by: Ian Stapleton Cordasco <graffatcolmingov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dmitri Shuralyov <dmitshur@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: Go LUCI <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
2025-06-30 09:51:57 -07:00