Commit Graph
3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Lynn Boger af544f31c8 internal/chacha20: improve chacha20 performance on ppc64le
This improves the performance of the asm implementation for
chacha20 on ppc64le by updating to the vsx implementation
provided in cryptogams. The previous implementation was found to
not perform as well as possible on power9. This implementation
improves performance on both power8 and power9.

Power9 improvement with this change as compared to current:

name               old time/op    new time/op     delta
ChaCha20/32-64        361ns ± 0%      225ns ± 0%  -37.67%  (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ChaCha20/63-64        364ns ± 0%      229ns ± 0%  -37.09%  (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ChaCha20/64-64        364ns ± 0%      231ns ± 0%  -36.54%  (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ChaCha20/256-64       332ns ± 0%      199ns ± 0%  -40.06%  (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ChaCha20/1024-64     1.24µs ± 0%     0.70µs ± 0%  -43.23%  (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ChaCha20/1350-64     1.89µs ± 0%     1.03µs ± 0%  -45.35%  (p=1.000 n=1+1)
ChaCha20/65536-64    77.0µs ± 0%     42.5µs ± 0%  -44.83%  (p=1.000 n=1+1)

This is discussed in issue golang/go#25051.

A few asm instructions vmrgew and vmrgow were just added in Go 1.14
so have been encoded using WORD at this point.

Change-Id: I2b192a63cf46b0b20195e60e4412c43c5dd14ad8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/195959
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2019-10-10 18:54:27 +00:00
Carlos Eduardo Seo 5c40567a22 internal/chacha20: fix variable naming
Wrong variable naming was causing 'go vet' to fail. This change fixes that.

Change-Id: I71e1842ece098198773fb326a725b57fad02f82f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/181720
Run-TryBot: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2019-06-11 18:44:40 +00:00
Carlos Eduardo Seo 20be4c3c3e internal/chacha20: improve performance for ppc64le
Add asm implementation for chacha20 using vector instructions on ppc64le.
Below, the difference using the new code:

name               old speed     new speed      delta
ChaCha20/32-16     167MB/s ± 0%   129MB/s ± 0%   -22.60%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ChaCha20/63-16     308MB/s ± 0%   249MB/s ± 0%   -19.00%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ChaCha20/64-16     357MB/s ± 0%   251MB/s ± 0%   -29.57%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ChaCha20/256-16    398MB/s ± 0%  1199MB/s ± 0%  +201.20%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ChaCha20/1024-16   413MB/s ± 0%  1398MB/s ± 0%  +238.67%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ChaCha20/1350-16   395MB/s ± 0%  1189MB/s ± 0%  +200.71%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)
ChaCha20/65536-16  420MB/s ± 0%  1489MB/s ± 0%  +254.10%  (p=0.008 n=5+5)

Small sizes are slower due the fact that it always calculates using
256 bytes of key stream.

This change was originally from Paulo Flabiano Smorigo <pfsmorigo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
and started as CL 108999 (https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/108999).

Fixes golang/go#25051

Change-Id: Ie510494249b227379e23d993467256b3d4088035
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/172177
Run-TryBot: Carlos Eduardo Seo <cseo@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Lynn Boger <laboger@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2019-05-30 12:26:14 +00:00