Previously, the server selected the Diffie-Hellman group based solely on
the MaxBits value provided by the client. This resulted in suboptimal
modulus selection, often ignoring the client's PreferredBits or selecting
a larger-than-necessary group.
This change implements a "best fit" selection algorithm similar to
OpenSSH's choose_dh logic. It attempts to find the smallest available
group larger than or equal to the client's PreferredBits, falling back to
the largest available group within the accepted range if no group above
the preference is available.
Additionally, this commit caches the parsed Oakley groups using
sync.OnceValue, avoiding repeated big.Int parsing on every handshake
while keeping the cost out of package initialization.
This issue was found during a security audit by NCC Group Cryptography
Services, sponsored by Teleport, and was assessed and is being fixed as
a non-security bug.
Change-Id: Idfa81bbcf354a7fb7b541cb4bbeb6e4a0181398a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/782424
Auto-Submit: Nicola Murino <nicola.murino@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Mark Freeman <markfreeman@google.com>
LUCI-TryBot-Result: golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com <golang-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com>
The server implementation looks at the HostKeys to advertise and
negotiate host key signature algorithms. A fundamental issue of the
Signer and AlgorithmSigner interfaces is that they don't expose the
supported signature algorithms, so really the server has to guess.
Currently, it would guess exclusively based on the PublicKey.Type,
regardless of whether the host key implemented AlgorithmSigner. This
means that a legacy Signer that only supports ssh-rsa still led the
server to negotiate rsa-sha2 algorithms. The server would then fail to
find a suitable host key to make the signature and crash.
This won't happen if only Signers from this package are used, but if a
custom Signer that doesn't support SignWithAlgorithm() but returns
"ssh-rsa" from PublicKey().Type() is used as a HostKey, the server is
vulnerable to DoS.
The only workable rules to determine what to advertise seems to be:
1. a pure Signer will always Sign with the PublicKey.Type
2. an AlgorithmSigner supports all algorithms associated with the
PublicKey.Type
Rule number two means that we can't add new supported algorithms in the
future, which is not great, but it's too late to fix that.
rsaSigner was breaking rule number one, and although it would have been
fine where it's used, I didn't want to break our own interface contract.
It's unclear why we had separate test key entries for rsa-sha2
algorithms, since we can use the ssh-rsa key for those. The only test
that used them, TestCertTypes, seemed broken: the init was actually
failing at making the corresponding signers rsaSigners, and indeed the
test for the SHA-256 signer expected and checked a SHA-512 signature.
Pending CVE
For golang/go#49952
Change-Id: Ie658eefcadd87906e63fc7faae8249376aa96c79
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/crypto/+/392355
Trust: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Roland Shoemaker <roland@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Adds readPacket() to conn, and renames conn to packetConn.
Key exchanges operate on packetConn, so they can be
unittested.
R=agl, jpsugar, dave
CC=golang-dev
https://golang.org/cl/13352055