Files
obsidian-sympozium/07-Porównania/Sympozium vs frameworki in-process.md
2026-03-25 00:05:57 +01:00

76 lines
3.5 KiB
Markdown

# Sympozium vs frameworki in-process
#sympozium #porównanie #langchain #crewai
## Kontekst
Frameworki in-process (LangChain, CrewAI, AutoGen, LlamaIndex) uruchamiają agentów w jednym procesie. Sympozium reprezentuje podejście "infrastructure-native".
## Porównanie architektoniczne
| Aspekt | In-process frameworks | Sympozium (K8s-native) |
|--------|----------------------|------------------------|
| **Wykonanie agenta** | Shared memory, single process | Ephemeral **Pod** per invocation |
| **Orkiestracja** | In-process registry + queue | **CRD-based** + controller reconciliation |
| **Sandbox** | Docker sidecar (long-lived) | Pod **SecurityContext** + Agent Sandbox |
| **IPC** | In-process EventEmitter | Filesystem sidecar + **NATS JetStream** |
| **Tool gating** | In-process pipeline | **Admission webhooks** + SympoziumPolicy |
| **Persistent memory** | Files on disk | **SQLite + FTS5** na PVC |
| **Scheduled tasks** | Cron jobs / external | **SympoziumSchedule CRD** |
| **State** | SQLite + flat files | **etcd** + PostgreSQL |
| **Multi-tenancy** | Single-instance file lock | **Namespaced CRDs** + RBAC |
| **Scaling** | Vertical only | **Horizontal** - stateless control plane |
| **Channels** | In-process per channel | Dedicated **Deployment** per channel |
| **External tools** | Plugin SDKs | **MCPServer CRD** + auto-discovery |
| **Observability** | Application logs | kubectl, OTel, TUI, Web UI |
## Dlaczego "infrastructure-native"?
Sympozium nie implementuje orkiestracji w kodzie aplikacji. Zamiast tego **mapuje koncepty agentowe na prymitywy Kubernetes**:
```
LangChain concept → Sympozium concept → K8s primitive
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Agent → AgentRun → Job/Pod
Tool → SkillPack sidecar → Container + RBAC
Memory → Memory server → Deployment + PVC
Chain → Sub-agents → Parent-child Jobs
Guard rail → SympoziumPolicy → Admission Webhook
Scheduler → SympoziumSchedule → CRD + Controller
Callback handler → NATS events → JetStream pub/sub
Vector store → SQLite FTS5 → PVC-backed DB
```
## Analiza trade-offs
### Complexity
- **In-process:** Prosty pip install, kilka linii Pythona
- **Sympozium:** K8s cluster, Helm install, CRDs, controllers
### Flexibility
- **In-process:** Dowolny Python code, łatwe prototyping
- **Sympozium:** Deklaratywny YAML, ograniczony do tego co CRDs oferują
### Production readiness
- **In-process:** Trzeba samemu zbudować izolację, scaling, monitoring
- **Sympozium:** Built-in isolation, scaling, monitoring, multi-tenancy
### Debugging
- **In-process:** Standard Python debugger, print statements
- **Sympozium:** kubectl logs, OTel traces, TUI, CRD status
## Kiedy co?
| Scenariusz | In-process | Sympozium |
|-----------|------------|-----------|
| Prototyping | Idealne | Overkill |
| Single developer | Idealne | Za dużo overhead |
| Production multi-tenant | Trudne | Idealne |
| Cluster operations | Niebezpieczne | Bezpieczne |
| Scheduled automation | Wymaga dodatkowej infra | Built-in |
| Compliance/audit | Wymaga budowy | Native |
---
Powiązane: [[Sympozium vs kagent]] | [[Kluczowe decyzje projektowe]] | [[Model efemerycznych agentów]]