mirror of
https://github.com/hesamsheikh/awesome-openclaw-usecases.git
synced 2026-02-20 01:35:11 +00:00
201 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
201 lines
7.9 KiB
Markdown
# Multi-Agent Specialized Team (Solo Founder Setup)
|
|
|
|
Solo founders wear every hat — strategy, development, marketing, sales, operations. Context-switching between these roles destroys deep work. Hiring is expensive and slow. What if you could spin up a small, specialized team of AI agents, each with a distinct role and personality, all controllable from a single chat interface?
|
|
|
|
This use case sets up multiple OpenClaw agents as a coordinated team, each specialized in a domain, communicating through shared memory and controlled via Telegram.
|
|
|
|
## Pain Point
|
|
|
|
- **One agent can't do everything well**: A single agent's context window fills up fast when juggling strategy, code, marketing research, and business analysis
|
|
- **No specialization**: Generic prompts produce generic outputs — a coding agent shouldn't also be crafting marketing copy
|
|
- **Solo founder burnout**: You need a team, not another tool to manage. The agents should work in the background and surface results, not require constant babysitting
|
|
- **Knowledge silos**: Insights from marketing research don't automatically inform dev priorities unless you manually bridge them
|
|
|
|
## What It Does
|
|
|
|
- **Specialized agents**: Each agent has a distinct role, personality, and model optimized for its domain
|
|
- **Shared memory**: Project docs, goals, and key decisions are accessible to all agents — nothing gets lost
|
|
- **Private context**: Each agent also maintains its own conversation history and domain-specific notes
|
|
- **Single control plane**: All agents are accessible through one Telegram group chat — tag the agent you need
|
|
- **Scheduled daily tasks**: Agents proactively work without being asked — content prompts, competitor monitoring, metric tracking
|
|
- **Parallel execution**: Multiple agents can work on independent tasks simultaneously
|
|
|
|
## Example Team Configuration
|
|
|
|
### Agent 1: Milo (Strategy Lead)
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
## SOUL.md — Milo
|
|
|
|
You are Milo, the team lead. Confident, big-picture, charismatic.
|
|
|
|
Responsibilities:
|
|
- Strategic planning and prioritization
|
|
- Coordinating the other agents
|
|
- Weekly goal setting and OKR tracking
|
|
- Synthesizing insights from all agents into actionable decisions
|
|
|
|
Model: Claude Opus
|
|
Channel: Telegram (responds to @milo)
|
|
|
|
Daily tasks:
|
|
- 8:00 AM: Review overnight agent activity, post morning standup summary
|
|
- 6:00 PM: End-of-day recap with progress toward weekly goals
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Agent 2: Josh (Business & Growth)
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
## SOUL.md — Josh
|
|
|
|
You are Josh, the business analyst. Pragmatic, straight to the point, numbers-driven.
|
|
|
|
Responsibilities:
|
|
- Pricing strategy and competitive analysis
|
|
- Growth metrics and KPI tracking
|
|
- Revenue modeling and unit economics
|
|
- Customer feedback analysis
|
|
|
|
Model: Claude Sonnet (fast, analytical)
|
|
Channel: Telegram (responds to @josh)
|
|
|
|
Daily tasks:
|
|
- 9:00 AM: Pull and summarize key metrics
|
|
- Track competitor pricing changes weekly
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Agent 3: Marketing Agent
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
## SOUL.md — Marketing Agent
|
|
|
|
You are the marketing researcher. Creative, curious, trend-aware.
|
|
|
|
Responsibilities:
|
|
- Content ideation and drafting
|
|
- Competitor social media monitoring
|
|
- Reddit/HN/X trend tracking for relevant topics
|
|
- SEO keyword research
|
|
|
|
Model: Gemini (strong at web research and long-context analysis)
|
|
Channel: Telegram (responds to @marketing)
|
|
|
|
Daily tasks:
|
|
- 10:00 AM: Surface 3 content ideas based on trending topics
|
|
- Monitor competitor Reddit/X mentions daily
|
|
- Weekly content calendar draft
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### Agent 4: Dev Agent
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
## SOUL.md — Dev Agent
|
|
|
|
You are the dev agent. Precise, thorough, security-conscious.
|
|
|
|
Responsibilities:
|
|
- Coding and architecture decisions
|
|
- Code review and quality checks
|
|
- Bug investigation and fixing
|
|
- Technical documentation
|
|
|
|
Model: Claude Opus / Codex (for implementation)
|
|
Channel: Telegram (responds to @dev)
|
|
|
|
Daily tasks:
|
|
- Check CI/CD pipeline health
|
|
- Review open PRs
|
|
- Flag technical debt items
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Skills You Need
|
|
|
|
- `telegram` skill for the shared control interface
|
|
- `sessions_spawn` / `sessions_send` for multi-agent coordination
|
|
- Shared file system or note-taking tool for team memory
|
|
- Individual API keys for different model providers (if using mixed models)
|
|
- A VPS or always-on machine to run the agents
|
|
|
|
## How to Set It Up
|
|
|
|
### 1. Shared Memory Structure
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
team/
|
|
├── GOALS.md # Current OKRs and priorities (all agents read)
|
|
├── DECISIONS.md # Key decisions log (append-only)
|
|
├── PROJECT_STATUS.md # Current project state (updated by all)
|
|
├── agents/
|
|
│ ├── milo/ # Milo's private context and notes
|
|
│ ├── josh/ # Josh's private context
|
|
│ ├── marketing/ # Marketing agent's research
|
|
│ └── dev/ # Dev agent's technical notes
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 2. Telegram Routing
|
|
|
|
Configure a single Telegram group where all agents listen, but each responds only when tagged:
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
## AGENTS.md — Telegram Routing
|
|
|
|
Telegram group: "Team"
|
|
|
|
Routing:
|
|
- @milo → Strategy agent (spawns/resumes milo session)
|
|
- @josh → Business agent (spawns/resumes josh session)
|
|
- @marketing → Marketing agent (spawns/resumes marketing session)
|
|
- @dev → Dev agent (spawns/resumes dev session)
|
|
- @all → Broadcast to all agents
|
|
- No tag → Milo (team lead) handles by default
|
|
|
|
Each agent:
|
|
1. Reads shared GOALS.md and PROJECT_STATUS.md for context
|
|
2. Reads its own private notes
|
|
3. Processes the message
|
|
4. Responds in Telegram
|
|
5. Updates shared files if the response involves a decision or status change
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
### 3. Scheduled Tasks
|
|
|
|
```text
|
|
## HEARTBEAT.md — Team Schedule
|
|
|
|
Daily:
|
|
- 8:00 AM: Milo posts morning standup (aggregates overnight agent activity)
|
|
- 9:00 AM: Josh pulls key metrics
|
|
- 10:00 AM: Marketing surfaces content ideas from trending topics
|
|
- 6:00 PM: Milo posts end-of-day recap
|
|
|
|
Ongoing:
|
|
- Dev: Monitor CI/CD health, review PRs as they come in
|
|
- Marketing: Reddit/X keyword monitoring (every 2 hours)
|
|
- Josh: Competitor pricing checks (weekly)
|
|
|
|
Weekly:
|
|
- Monday: Milo drafts weekly priorities (input from all agents)
|
|
- Friday: Josh compiles weekly metrics report
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Key Insights
|
|
|
|
- **Personality matters more than you'd think**: Giving agents distinct names and communication styles makes it natural to "talk to your team" rather than wrestle with a generic AI
|
|
- **Shared memory + private context**: The combination is critical — agents need common ground (goals, decisions) but also their own space to accumulate domain expertise
|
|
- **Right model for the right job**: Don't use an expensive reasoning model for keyword monitoring. Match model capability to task complexity
|
|
- **Scheduled tasks are the flywheel**: The real value emerges when agents proactively surface insights, not just when you ask
|
|
- **Start with 2, not 4**: Begin with a lead + one specialist, then add agents as you identify bottlenecks
|
|
|
|
## Inspired By
|
|
|
|
This pattern was described by [Trebuh on X](https://x.com/iamtrebuh/status/2011260468975771862), a solo founder who set up 4 OpenClaw agents — Milo (strategy lead), Josh (business), a marketing agent, and a dev agent — all controlled through a single Telegram chat on a VPS. Each agent has its own personality, model, and scheduled tasks, while sharing project memory. He described it as "a real small team available 24/7."
|
|
|
|
The pattern was also confirmed on the [OpenClaw Showcase](https://openclaw.ai/showcase), where `@jdrhyne` reported running "15+ agents, 3 machines, 1 Discord server — IT built most of this, just by chatting," and `@nateliason` described a multi-model pipeline (prototype → summarize → optimize → implement → repeat) using different models at each stage. Another user, `@danpeguine`, runs two different OpenClaw instances collaborating in the same WhatsApp group.
|
|
|
|
## Related Links
|
|
|
|
- [OpenClaw Subagent Documentation](https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw)
|
|
- [OpenClaw Telegram Skill](https://github.com/openclaw/openclaw)
|
|
- [OpenClaw Showcase](https://openclaw.ai/showcase)
|
|
- [Anthropic: Building Effective Agents](https://www.anthropic.com/research/building-effective-agents)
|