Files
awesome-copilot/skills/doublecheck/assets/verification-report-template.md
Dan Velton eb7d223446 Add doublecheck plugin: three-layer verification pipeline for AI output (#978)
* Add doublecheck plugin: three-layer verification pipeline for AI output

Adds a new plugin that helps users verify AI-generated content before
acting on it. Designed for sensitive contexts (legal, medical, financial,
compliance) where hallucinations carry real consequences.

Three verification layers:
- Self-Audit: extracts verifiable claims, checks internal consistency
- Source Verification: web searches per claim, produces URLs for human review
- Adversarial Review: assumes errors exist, checks hallucination patterns

Supports persistent mode (auto-verifies every factual response inline)
and one-shot mode (full report on specific text). Confidence ratings:
VERIFIED, PLAUSIBLE, UNVERIFIED, DISPUTED, FABRICATION RISK.

Includes:
- Skill (skills/doublecheck/) with bundled report template
- Agent (agents/doublecheck.agent.md) for interactive verification
- Plugin package (plugins/doublecheck/) bundling both

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

* Address review: fix tools YAML format, remove materialized artifacts

- Fix tools frontmatter in agents/doublecheck.agent.md to use standard
  YAML list format instead of flow sequence with trailing comma
- Remove plugins/doublecheck/agents/ and plugins/doublecheck/skills/
  from tracking; these paths are in .gitignore as CI-materialized
  artifacts that should not be committed

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
2026-03-12 12:35:43 +11:00

93 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown

# Verification Report
## Summary
**Text verified:** [Brief description of what was checked]
**Claims extracted:** [N total]
**Breakdown:**
| Rating | Count |
|--------|-------|
| VERIFIED | |
| PLAUSIBLE | |
| UNVERIFIED | |
| DISPUTED | |
| FABRICATION RISK | |
**Items requiring attention:** [N items rated DISPUTED or FABRICATION RISK]
---
## Flagged Items (Review These First)
Items rated DISPUTED or FABRICATION RISK. These need your attention before you rely on the source material.
### [C#] -- [Brief description of the claim]
- **Claim:** [The specific assertion from the target text]
- **Rating:** [DISPUTED or FABRICATION RISK]
- **Finding:** [What the verification found -- what's wrong or suspicious]
- **Source:** [URL to contradicting or relevant source]
- **Recommendation:** [What the user should do -- e.g., "Verify this citation in Westlaw" or "Remove this statistic unless you can find a primary source"]
---
## All Claims
Full results for every extracted claim, grouped by confidence rating.
### VERIFIED
#### [C#] -- [Brief description]
- **Claim:** [The assertion]
- **Source:** [URL]
- **Notes:** [Any relevant context about the source]
### PLAUSIBLE
#### [C#] -- [Brief description]
- **Claim:** [The assertion]
- **Notes:** [Why this is rated plausible rather than verified]
### UNVERIFIED
#### [C#] -- [Brief description]
- **Claim:** [The assertion]
- **Notes:** [What was searched, why nothing was found]
### DISPUTED
#### [C#] -- [Brief description]
- **Claim:** [The assertion]
- **Contradicting source:** [URL]
- **Details:** [What the source says vs. what the claim says]
### FABRICATION RISK
#### [C#] -- [Brief description]
- **Claim:** [The assertion]
- **Pattern:** [Which hallucination pattern this matches]
- **Details:** [Why this is flagged -- e.g., "citation not found in any legal database"]
---
## Internal Consistency
[Any contradictions found within the target text itself, or "No internal contradictions detected."]
---
## What Was Not Checked
[List any claims that could not be evaluated -- paywalled sources, claims requiring specialized databases, unfalsifiable assertions, etc.]
---
## Limitations
- This tool accelerates human verification; it does not replace it.
- Web search results may not include the most recent information or paywalled sources.
- The adversarial review uses the same underlying model that may have produced the original output. It catches many issues but cannot catch all of them.
- A claim rated VERIFIED means a supporting source was found, not that the claim is definitely correct. Sources can be wrong too.
- Claims rated PLAUSIBLE may still be wrong. The absence of contradicting evidence is not proof of accuracy.