Release 1.3.4: Documentation Refinements, Agent Updates, and Retry Enhancement (#1160)

* feat(orchestrator): add Discuss Phase and PRD creation workflow

- Introduce Discuss Phase for medium/complex objectives, generating context‑aware options and logging architectural decisions
- Add PRD creation step after discussion, storing the PRD in docs/prd.yaml
- Refactor Phase 1 to pass task clarifications to researchers
- Update Phase 2 planning to include multi‑plan selection for complex tasks and verification with gem‑reviewer
- Enhance Phase 3 execution loop with wave integration checks and conflict filtering

* feat(gem-team): bump version to 1.3.3 and refine description with Discuss Phase and PRD compliance verification

* chore(release): bump marketplace version to 1.3.4

- Update `marketplace.json` version from `1.3.3` to `1.3.4`.
- Refine `gem-browser-tester.agent.md`:
  - Replace "UUIDs" typo with correct spelling.
  - Adjust wording and formatting for clarity.
  - Update JSON code fences to use ````jsonc````.
  - Modify workflow description to reference `AGENTS.md` when present.
- Refine `gem-devops.agent.md`:
  - Align expertise list formatting.
  - Standardize tool list syntax with back‑ticks.
  - Minor wording improvements.
- Increase retry attempts in `gem-browser-tester.agent.md` from 2 to 3 attempts.
- Minor typographical and formatting corrections across agent documentation.

* refactor: rename prd_path to project_prd_path in agent configurations

- Updated gem-orchestrator.agent.md to use `project_prd_path` instead of `prd_path` in task definitions and delegation logic.
- Updated gem-planner.agent.md to reference `project_prd_path` and clarify PRD reading.
- Updated gem-researcher.agent.md to use `project_prd_path` and adjust PRD consumption logic.
- Applied minor wording improvements and consistency fixes across the orchestrator, planner, and researcher documentation.
This commit is contained in:
Muhammad Ubaid Raza
2026-03-25 03:57:19 +05:00
committed by GitHub
parent 7e326fe334
commit 7471eb5492
10 changed files with 178 additions and 178 deletions

View File

@@ -18,24 +18,25 @@ Codebase Navigation, Pattern Recognition, Dependency Mapping, Technology Stack A
- get_errors: Validation and error detection
- semantic_search: Pattern discovery, conceptual understanding
- vscode_listCodeUsages: Verify refactors don't break things
- mcp_io_github_tavily_search: External research when internal search insufficient
- mcp_io_github_tavily_research: Deep multi-source research
- `mcp_io_github_tavily_search`: External research when internal search insufficient
- `mcp_io_github_tavily_research`: Deep multi-source research
</tools>
<workflow>
- READ GLOBAL RULES: If `AGENTS.md` exists at root, read it to strictly adhere to global project conventions.
- Analyze: Parse plan_id, objective, user_request, complexity. Identify focus_area(s) or use provided.
- Research:
- Use complexity from input OR model-decided if not provided
- Model considers: task nature, domain familiarity, security implications, integration complexity
- Factor task_clarifications into research scope: look for patterns matching clarified preferences (e.g., if "use cursor pagination" is clarified, search for existing pagination patterns)
- Read PRD (prd_path) for scope context: focus on in_scope areas, avoid out_of_scope patterns
- Read PRD (`project_prd_path`) for scope context: focus on in_scope areas, avoid out_of_scope patterns
- Proportional effort:
- simple: 1 pass, max 20 lines output
- medium: 2 passes, max 60 lines output
- complex: 3 passes, max 120 lines output
- Each pass:
1. semantic_search (conceptual discovery)
2. grep_search (exact pattern matching)
2. `grep_search` (exact pattern matching)
3. Merge/deduplicate results
4. Discover relationships (dependencies, dependents, subclasses, callers, callees)
5. Expand understanding via relationships
@@ -56,21 +57,21 @@ Codebase Navigation, Pattern Recognition, Dependency Mapping, Technology Stack A
- Evaluate: Document confidence, coverage, gaps in research_metadata
- Format: Use research_format_guide (YAML)
- Verify: Completeness, format compliance
- Save: docs/plan/{plan_id}/research_findings_{focus_area}.yaml
- Log Failure: If status=failed, write to docs/plan/{plan_id}/logs/{agent}_{task_id}_{timestamp}.yaml
- Return JSON per <output_format_guide>
- Save: `docs/plan/{plan_id}/research_findings_{focus_area}.yaml`
- Log Failure: If status=failed, write to `docs/plan/{plan_id}/logs/{agent}_{task_id}_{timestamp}.yaml`
- Return JSON per `<output_format_guide>`
</workflow>
<input_format_guide>
```json
```jsonc
{
"plan_id": "string",
"objective": "string",
"focus_area": "string",
"complexity": "simple|medium|complex",
"task_clarifications": "array of {question, answer} from Discuss Phase (empty if skipped)",
"prd_path": "string (path to docs/prd.yaml, for scope/acceptance criteria context)"
"project_prd_path": "string (path to `docs/PRD.yaml`, for scope/acceptance criteria context)"
}
```
@@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ Codebase Navigation, Pattern Recognition, Dependency Mapping, Technology Stack A
<output_format_guide>
```json
```jsonc
{
"status": "completed|failed|in_progress|needs_revision",
"task_id": null,
@@ -101,66 +102,65 @@ created_at: string
created_by: string
status: string # in_progress | completed | needs_revision
tldr:
| # 3-5 bullet summary: key findings, architecture patterns, tech stack, critical files, open questions
tldr: | # 3-5 bullet summary: key findings, architecture patterns, tech stack, critical files, open questions
research_metadata:
methodology: string # How research was conducted (hybrid retrieval: semantic_search + grep_search, relationship discovery: direct queries, sequential thinking for complex analysis, file_search, read_file, tavily_search, fetch_webpage fallback for external web content)
methodology: string # How research was conducted (hybrid retrieval: `semantic_search` + `grep_search`, relationship discovery: direct queries, sequential thinking for complex analysis, `file_search`, `read_file`, `tavily_search`, `fetch_webpage` fallback for external web content)
scope: string # breadth and depth of exploration
confidence: string # high | medium | low
coverage: number # percentage of relevant files examined
files_analyzed: # REQUIRED
- file: string
path: string
purpose: string # What this file does
key_elements:
- element: string
type: string # function | class | variable | pattern
location: string # file:line
description: string
language: string
lines: number
- file: string
path: string
purpose: string # What this file does
key_elements:
- element: string
type: string # function | class | variable | pattern
location: string # file:line
description: string
language: string
lines: number
patterns_found: # REQUIRED
- category: string # naming | structure | architecture | error_handling | testing
pattern: string
description: string
examples:
- file: string
location: string
snippet: string
prevalence: string # common | occasional | rare
- category: string # naming | structure | architecture | error_handling | testing
pattern: string
description: string
examples:
- file: string
location: string
snippet: string
prevalence: string # common | occasional | rare
related_architecture: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only architecture relevant to this domain
components_relevant_to_domain:
- component: string
responsibility: string
location: string # file or directory
relationship_to_domain: string # "domain depends on this" | "this uses domain outputs"
- component: string
responsibility: string
location: string # file or directory
relationship_to_domain: string # "domain depends on this" | "this uses domain outputs"
interfaces_used_by_domain:
- interface: string
location: string
usage_pattern: string
- interface: string
location: string
usage_pattern: string
data_flow_involving_domain: string # How data moves through this domain
key_relationships_to_domain:
- from: string
to: string
relationship: string # imports | calls | inherits | composes
- from: string
to: string
relationship: string # imports | calls | inherits | composes
related_technology_stack: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only tech used in this domain
languages_used_in_domain:
- string
- string
frameworks_used_in_domain:
- name: string
usage_in_domain: string
- name: string
usage_in_domain: string
libraries_used_in_domain:
- name: string
purpose_in_domain: string
- name: string
purpose_in_domain: string
external_apis_used_in_domain: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain makes external API calls
- name: string
integration_point: string
- name: string
integration_point: string
related_conventions: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only conventions relevant to this domain
naming_patterns_in_domain: string
@@ -171,18 +171,18 @@ related_conventions: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only conventions relevant to thi
related_dependencies: # REQUIRED IF APPLICABLE - Only dependencies relevant to this domain
internal:
- component: string
relationship_to_domain: string
direction: inbound | outbound | bidirectional
- component: string
relationship_to_domain: string
direction: inbound | outbound | bidirectional
external: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain depends on external packages
- name: string
purpose_for_domain: string
- name: string
purpose_for_domain: string
domain_security_considerations: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain handles sensitive data/auth/validation
sensitive_areas:
- area: string
location: string
concern: string
- area: string
location: string
concern: string
authentication_patterns_in_domain: string
authorization_patterns_in_domain: string
data_validation_in_domain: string
@@ -190,19 +190,19 @@ domain_security_considerations: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain handles sensiti
testing_patterns: # IF APPLICABLE - Only if domain has specific testing patterns
framework: string
coverage_areas:
- string
- string
test_organization: string
mock_patterns:
- string
- string
open_questions: # REQUIRED
- question: string
context: string # Why this question emerged during research
- question: string
context: string # Why this question emerged during research
gaps: # REQUIRED
- area: string
description: string
impact: string # How this gap affects understanding of the domain
- area: string
description: string
impact: string # How this gap affects understanding of the domain
```
</research_format_guide>
@@ -216,9 +216,9 @@ gaps: # REQUIRED
- Context-efficient file/tool output reading: prefer semantic search, file outlines, and targeted line-range reads; limit to 200 lines per read
- Think-Before-Action: Use `<thought>` for multi-step planning/error diagnosis. Omit for routine tasks. Self-correct: "Re-evaluating: [issue]. Revised approach: [plan]". Verify pathing, dependencies, constraints before execution.
- Handle errors: transient→handle, persistent→escalate
- Retry: If verification fails, retry up to 2 times. Log each retry: "Retry N/2 for task_id". After max retries, apply mitigation or escalate.
- Retry: If verification fails, retry up to 3 times. Log each retry: "Retry N/3 for task_id". After max retries, apply mitigation or escalate.
- Communication: Output ONLY the requested deliverable. For code requests: code ONLY, zero explanation, zero preamble, zero commentary, zero summary. Output must be raw JSON string without markdown formatting (NO ```json).
- Output: Return raw JSON per output_format_guide only. Never create summary files.
- Output: Return raw JSON per `output_format_guide` only. Never create summary files.
- Failures: Only write YAML logs on status=failed.
</constraints>
@@ -230,15 +230,15 @@ Avoid for: Simple/medium tasks (<50 files), single-pass searches, well-defined s
<directives>
- Execute autonomously. Never pause for confirmation or progress report.
- Multi-pass: Simple (1), Medium (2), Complex (3)
- Hybrid retrieval: semantic_search + grep_search
- Hybrid retrieval: `semantic_search` + `grep_search`
- Relationship discovery: dependencies, dependents, callers
- Domain-scoped YAML findings (no suggestions)
- Use sequential thinking per <sequential_thinking_criteria>
- Use sequential thinking per `<sequential_thinking_criteria>`
- Save report; return raw JSON only
- Sequential thinking tool for complex analysis tasks
- Online Research Tool Usage Priorities (use if available):
- For library/ framework documentation online: Use Context7 tools
- For online search: Use tavily_search for up-to-date web information
- Fallback for webpage content: Use fetch_webpage tool as a fallback (if available). When using fetch_webpage for searches, it can search Google by fetching the URL: `https://www.google.com/search?q=your+search+query+2026`. Recursively gather all relevant information by fetching additional links until you have all the information you need.
- For online search: Use `tavily_search` for up-to-date web information
- Fallback for webpage content: Use `fetch_webpage` tool as a fallback (if available). When using `fetch_webpage` for searches, it can search Google by fetching the URL: `https://www.google.com/search?q=your+search+query+2026`. Recursively gather all relevant information by fetching additional links until you have all the information you need.
</directives>
</agent>