chore: publish from staged

This commit is contained in:
github-actions[bot]
2026-06-11 05:18:03 +00:00
parent c66eb401d2
commit 68945defe3
4 changed files with 12 additions and 12 deletions
+3 -3
View File
@@ -229,13 +229,13 @@ The public-submission policy builds on those rules and also requires `license` p
##### Review workflow
1. **Open an issue** using the external plugin issue form. Automation applies the `external-plugin` and `awaiting-review` labels.
2. **Automated intake validation** checks that the required fields are present and correctly formatted for a GitHub-hosted plugin. Invalid submissions are closed with a comment explaining what must be fixed before resubmitting.
2. **Automated intake validation** checks that the required fields are present and correctly formatted for a GitHub-hosted plugin. Invalid submissions are labeled `requires-submitter-fixes` with a comment explaining what must be fixed before maintainer review.
3. **Automated quality gates** run after metadata validation:
- `skill-validator check --plugin` against the submitted plugin path/ref/sha
- install smoke test via Copilot CLI against an ephemeral marketplace entry generated from the submission
4. **Ready for maintainer review**: if metadata validation and quality gates pass, automation removes `awaiting-review` and adds `ready-for-review`.
5. **Submitter-fix blocker**: if metadata is valid but quality gates fail, automation applies `requires-submitter-fixes` instead of advancing to human review.
6. **Requesting another intake pass**: after updating the issue body or source plugin, the issue author or a maintainer can comment `/rerun-intake` to re-run automated intake and quality gates on demand. Open issues still re-trigger intake automatically on edit, but closed rejected issues need `/rerun-intake`. When the rerun is accepted, automation reacts to the command comment with 👀 so it is visible that processing started.
6. **Requesting another intake pass**: after updating the issue body or source plugin, the issue author or a maintainer can comment `/rerun-intake` to re-run automated intake and quality gates on demand. Open issues re-trigger intake automatically on edit; closed maintainer-rejected issues need `/rerun-intake`. When the rerun is accepted, automation reacts to the command comment with 👀 so it is visible that processing started.
7. **Maintainer override path**: a maintainer with write access can comment `/mark-ready-for-review [optional reason]` to explicitly move a `requires-submitter-fixes` issue to `ready-for-review`.
8. **Maintainer decision**: once in `ready-for-review`, a maintainer with write access performs the manual review, then comments `/approve` or `/reject <reason>` on the issue. Commands from non-maintainers are ignored.
9. **Approval path**: on `/approve`, automation removes `ready-for-review`, adds `approved`, closes the issue, and opens or updates a PR against `staged` that updates `plugins/external.json` and generated marketplace outputs.
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ Maintainers are responsible for confirming that the submission:
- `external-plugin`: applied to every public external plugin submission and retained on approved issues so scheduled review automation can find them later
- `awaiting-review`: initial intake state before automation finishes validating the issue
- `ready-for-review`: the issue passed automated intake checks and is waiting on a maintainer decision
- `requires-submitter-fixes`: metadata validation passed but automated quality gates failed; submitter updates are required before human review
- `requires-submitter-fixes`: automated intake found metadata or quality-gate issues; submitter updates are required before human review
- `approved`: the issue was approved, closed, and can be used as the source of truth for six-month re-review
- `rejected`: the issue was rejected and closed without being added to the marketplace
- `re-review-due`: the approved issue reached the six-month review threshold and is waiting on a maintainer re-review decision