mirror of
https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot.git
synced 2026-07-21 12:54:13 +00:00
fix: address all 8 review comments
- Add YAML front matter to workshop-ta agent (name + description) - Fix agent path: use 'workshop-ta' not './agents/workshop-ta.agent.md' - Sort skills alphabetically in plugin.json - Make Cairn dashboard reference conditional (full plugin from source repo) - Update signal-write: write JSON to .signals/ AND note in journal - Add partnership signal type to signal-write skill - Inline CAIRN disposition in agent (treat external CAIRN.md as optional) - Run npm run build to regenerate marketplace.json and docs Co-authored-by: Copilot <223556219+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com> Copilot-Session: 26faf13e-639c-4a21-ac05-c0dc2bff7c62
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: signal-write
|
||||
description: 'Emit structured agent signals — hands-up, blocked, done, checkpoint. Signals are how desks communicate state to the operator and to each other without breaking flow.'
|
||||
description: 'Emit structured agent signals — hands-up, blocked, done, checkpoint, partnership. Signals are written as JSON to .signals/ for dashboard consumption and noted in the journal for persistence.'
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Agent Signals
|
||||
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Emit structured signals from a desk to the operator or other desks.
|
||||
- Work is complete and ready for review (done)
|
||||
- Significant progress worth noting (checkpoint)
|
||||
- Two desks disagree and can't resolve it (hands-up)
|
||||
- The TA is reporting coordination quality (partnership)
|
||||
|
||||
## Signal types
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -21,60 +22,72 @@ Two desks disagree and can't settle it against external facts.
|
||||
This is the system working — the operator reads where desks
|
||||
*disagree*, not where they perform confidence.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Signal: hands-up
|
||||
Desk: <desk-name>
|
||||
Summary: <what the disagreement is about>
|
||||
Desks involved: <which desks disagree>
|
||||
Evidence: <what each side is based on>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `blocked`
|
||||
A desk can't proceed without input — missing access, ambiguous
|
||||
scope, need a decision only the operator can make.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Signal: blocked
|
||||
Desk: <desk-name>
|
||||
Blocked on: <what's needed>
|
||||
Impact: <what can't proceed until this is resolved>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `done`
|
||||
Work is complete and ready for review. Artifacts are on the bench.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Signal: done
|
||||
Desk: <desk-name>
|
||||
Summary: <what was completed>
|
||||
Artifacts: <where to find the output>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### `checkpoint`
|
||||
Significant progress worth the operator knowing about, but work
|
||||
continues. Not blocked, not done — just a marker.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Signal: checkpoint
|
||||
Desk: <desk-name>
|
||||
Summary: <what was accomplished>
|
||||
Next: <what's happening next>
|
||||
```
|
||||
### `partnership`
|
||||
Used by the TA (room coordinator) to report coordination quality.
|
||||
Self-assessment scores reflect coordination, not code accuracy:
|
||||
- **intent** — understood what the operator needed
|
||||
- **confidence** — right work went to the right desks
|
||||
- **accuracy** — dispatched work produced the right outcome
|
||||
- **completeness** — nothing fell through the cracks
|
||||
|
||||
## How to emit
|
||||
|
||||
Write the signal to the desk's journal with a `[signal]` marker:
|
||||
### 1. Write a JSON signal file to `.signals/`
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## <date> — [signal:hands-up] <summary>
|
||||
- **Desks:** scanning, review
|
||||
- **Disagreement:** scanning found CWE-502 in lib/deserialize.cs;
|
||||
review says the SerializationBinder is sufficient
|
||||
- **Evidence:** <what each desk is basing its position on>
|
||||
This is the primary output — it's what the dashboard reads.
|
||||
Create `desks/<desk-name>/.signals/<timestamp>.json`:
|
||||
|
||||
```json
|
||||
{
|
||||
"signal_type": "execution",
|
||||
"agent_name": "<desk-name>",
|
||||
"self_assessment": {
|
||||
"intent": 4,
|
||||
"confidence": 5,
|
||||
"accuracy": 4,
|
||||
"completeness": 3
|
||||
},
|
||||
"patterns": {
|
||||
"what_worked": "description of what went well",
|
||||
"what_was_hard": "description of challenges",
|
||||
"skill_gap": "areas for improvement"
|
||||
},
|
||||
"escalation": {
|
||||
"reason": null,
|
||||
"blocked_on": null,
|
||||
"recommendation": null
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For cross-desk visibility, also note the signal on the bench if
|
||||
other desks need to see it before the operator routes it.
|
||||
For `hands-up` or `blocked` signals, populate the `escalation`
|
||||
fields. Use `signal_type: "escalation"` for these — they sort to
|
||||
the top of the dashboard.
|
||||
|
||||
For `partnership` signals (TA only), use `signal_type: "partnership"`.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Note the signal in the journal
|
||||
|
||||
Also append a short marker to the desk's journal for persistence:
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## <date> — [signal:<type>] <summary>
|
||||
- <key details>
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The journal note is the trail marker. The JSON file is the
|
||||
machine-readable signal.
|
||||
|
||||
## Principles
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -86,3 +99,5 @@ other desks need to see it before the operator routes it.
|
||||
changes that affect the room, not status updates.
|
||||
- blocked means truly blocked — not "I'd prefer input." If you
|
||||
can proceed with a reasonable default, proceed and note it.
|
||||
- Self-assessment scores should be honest, not optimistic. A 3/5
|
||||
is fine. A 5/5 on everything is suspicious.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user