mirror of https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot.git synced 2026-04-11 02:35:55 +00:00

Files

Jim Bennett d79183139a Add Arize and Phoenix LLM observability skills (#1204 )

* Add 9 Arize LLM observability skills

Add skills for Arize AI platform covering trace export, instrumentation,
datasets, experiments, evaluators, AI provider integrations, annotations,
prompt optimization, and deep linking to the Arize UI.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add 3 Phoenix AI observability skills

Add skills for Phoenix (Arize open-source) covering CLI debugging,
LLM evaluation workflows, and OpenInference tracing/instrumentation.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Ignoring intentional bad spelling

* Fix CI: remove .DS_Store from generated skills README and add codespell ignore

Remove .DS_Store artifact from winmd-api-search asset listing in generated
README.skills.md so it matches the CI Linux build output. Add queston to
codespell ignore list (intentional misspelling example in arize-dataset skill).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Add arize-ax and phoenix plugins

Bundle the 9 Arize skills into an arize-ax plugin and the 3 Phoenix
skills into a phoenix plugin for easier installation as single packages.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fix skill folder structures to match source repos

Move arize supporting files from references/ to root level and rename
phoenix references/ to rules/ to exactly match the original source
repository folder structures.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fixing file locations

* Fixing readme

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-04-02 09:58:55 +11:00

4.4 KiB

Raw Blame History

name, description, license, compatibility, metadata

name

description

license

compatibility

metadata

phoenix-evals

Build and run evaluators for AI/LLM applications using Phoenix.

Apache-2.0

Requires Phoenix server. Python skills need phoenix and openai packages; TypeScript skills need @arizeai/phoenix-client.

author	version	languages
oss@arize.com	1.0.0	Python, TypeScript

Phoenix Evals

Build evaluators for AI/LLM applications. Code first, LLM for nuance, validate against humans.

Quick Reference

Task	Files
Setup	setup-python, setup-typescript
Decide what to evaluate	evaluators-overview
Choose a judge model	fundamentals-model-selection
Use pre-built evaluators	evaluators-pre-built
Build code evaluator	evaluators-code-python, evaluators-code-typescript
Build LLM evaluator	evaluators-llm-python, evaluators-llm-typescript, evaluators-custom-templates
Batch evaluate DataFrame	evaluate-dataframe-python
Run experiment	experiments-running-python, experiments-running-typescript
Create dataset	experiments-datasets-python, experiments-datasets-typescript
Generate synthetic data	experiments-synthetic-python, experiments-synthetic-typescript
Validate evaluator accuracy	validation, validation-evaluators-python, validation-evaluators-typescript
Sample traces for review	observe-sampling-python, observe-sampling-typescript
Analyze errors	error-analysis, error-analysis-multi-turn, axial-coding
RAG evals	evaluators-rag
Avoid common mistakes	common-mistakes-python, fundamentals-anti-patterns
Production	production-overview, production-guardrails, production-continuous

Workflows

Starting Fresh: observe-tracing-setup → error-analysis → axial-coding → evaluators-overview

Building Evaluator: fundamentals → common-mistakes-python → evaluators-{code|llm}-{python|typescript} → validation-evaluators-{python|typescript}

RAG Systems: evaluators-rag → evaluators-code-* (retrieval) → evaluators-llm-* (faithfulness)

Production: production-overview → production-guardrails → production-continuous

Reference Categories

Prefix	Description
`fundamentals-*`	Types, scores, anti-patterns
`observe-*`	Tracing, sampling
`error-analysis-*`	Finding failures
`axial-coding-*`	Categorizing failures
`evaluators-*`	Code, LLM, RAG evaluators
`experiments-*`	Datasets, running experiments
`validation-*`	Validating evaluator accuracy against human labels
`production-*`	CI/CD, monitoring

Key Principles

Principle	Action
Error analysis first	Can't automate what you haven't observed
Custom > generic	Build from your failures
Code first	Deterministic before LLM
Validate judges	>80% TPR/TNR
Binary > Likert	Pass/fail, not 1-5

4.4 KiB Raw Blame History