# Reliability & Resilience Patterns ## Ambassador Pattern **Problem**: Services need proxy functionality for network requests (logging, monitoring, routing, security). **Solution**: Create helper services that send network requests on behalf of a consumer service or application. **When to Use**: - Offloading common client connectivity tasks (monitoring, logging, routing) - Supporting legacy applications that can't be easily modified - Implementing retry logic, circuit breakers, or timeout handling for remote services **Implementation Considerations**: - Deploy ambassador as a sidecar process or container with the application - Consider network latency introduced by the proxy layer - Ensure ambassador doesn't become a single point of failure ## Bulkhead Pattern **Problem**: A failure in one component can cascade and affect the entire system. **Solution**: Isolate elements of an application into pools so that if one fails, the others continue to function. **When to Use**: - Isolating critical resources from less critical ones - Preventing resource exhaustion in one area from affecting others - Partitioning consumers and resources to improve availability **Implementation Considerations**: - Separate connection pools for different backends - Partition service instances across different groups - Use resource limits (CPU, memory, threads) per partition - Monitor bulkhead health and capacity ## Circuit Breaker Pattern **Problem**: Applications can waste resources attempting operations that are likely to fail. **Solution**: Prevent an application from repeatedly trying to execute an operation that's likely to fail, allowing it to continue without waiting for the fault to be fixed. **When to Use**: - Protecting against cascading failures - Failing fast when a remote service is unavailable - Providing fallback behavior when services are down **Implementation Considerations**: - Define threshold for triggering circuit breaker (failures/time window) - Implement three states: Closed, Open, Half-Open - Set appropriate timeout values for operations - Log state transitions and failures for diagnostics - Provide meaningful error messages to clients ## Compensating Transaction Pattern **Problem**: Distributed transactions are difficult to implement and may not be supported. **Solution**: Undo the work performed by a sequence of steps that collectively form an eventually consistent operation. **When to Use**: - Implementing eventual consistency in distributed systems - Rolling back multi-step business processes that fail partway through - Handling long-running transactions that can't use 2PC **Implementation Considerations**: - Define compensating logic for each step in transaction - Store enough state to undo operations - Handle idempotency for compensation operations - Consider ordering dependencies between compensating actions ## Retry Pattern **Problem**: Transient failures are common in distributed systems. **Solution**: Enable applications to handle anticipated temporary failures by retrying failed operations. **When to Use**: - Handling transient faults (network glitches, temporary unavailability) - Operations expected to succeed after a brief delay - Non-idempotent operations with careful consideration **Implementation Considerations**: - Implement exponential backoff between retries - Set maximum retry count to avoid infinite loops - Distinguish between transient and permanent failures - Ensure operations are idempotent or track retry attempts - Consider jitter to avoid thundering herd problem ## Health Endpoint Monitoring Pattern **Problem**: External tools need to verify system health and availability. **Solution**: Implement functional checks in an application that external tools can access through exposed endpoints at regular intervals. **When to Use**: - Monitoring web applications and back-end services - Implementing readiness and liveness probes - Providing detailed health information to orchestrators **Implementation Considerations**: - Expose health endpoints (e.g., `/health`, `/ready`, `/live`) - Check critical dependencies (databases, queues, external services) - Return appropriate HTTP status codes (200, 503) - Implement authentication/authorization for sensitive health data - Provide different levels of detail based on security context ## Leader Election Pattern **Problem**: Distributed tasks need coordination through a single instance. **Solution**: Coordinate actions in a distributed application by electing one instance as the leader that manages collaborating task instances. **When to Use**: - Coordinating distributed tasks - Managing shared resources in a cluster - Ensuring single-instance execution of critical tasks **Implementation Considerations**: - Use distributed locking mechanisms (Redis, etcd, ZooKeeper) - Handle leader failures with automatic re-election - Implement heartbeats to detect leader health - Ensure followers can become leaders quickly ## Saga Pattern **Problem**: Maintaining data consistency across microservices without distributed transactions. **Solution**: Manage data consistency across microservices in distributed transaction scenarios using a sequence of local transactions. **When to Use**: - Long-running business processes spanning multiple services - Distributed transactions without 2PC support - Eventual consistency requirements across microservices **Implementation Considerations**: - Choose between orchestration (centralized) or choreography (event-based) - Define compensating transactions for rollback scenarios - Handle partial failures and rollback logic - Implement idempotency for all saga steps - Provide clear audit trails and monitoring ## Sequential Convoy Pattern **Problem**: Process related messages in order without blocking independent message groups. **Solution**: Process a set of related messages in a defined order without blocking other message groups. **When to Use**: - Message processing requires strict ordering within groups - Independent message groups can be processed in parallel - Implementing session-based message processing **Implementation Considerations**: - Use session IDs or partition keys to group related messages - Process each group sequentially but process groups in parallel - Handle message failures within a session appropriately