mirror of
https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot.git
synced 2026-02-21 10:55:13 +00:00
Add 18 new prompts files (#56)
* Add prompts for .NET best practices, design pattern review, and GitHub Copilot suggestions - Introduced a comprehensive prompt for ensuring .NET/C# code adheres to best practices, covering documentation, design patterns, dependency injection, resource management, async patterns, testing standards, configuration, AI integration, error handling, performance, security, and code quality. - Added a prompt for reviewing C#/.NET code for design pattern implementation, providing a checklist for required patterns, architecture, best practices, SOLID principles, performance, maintainability, testability, security, documentation, code clarity, and clean code. - Created prompts for suggesting relevant GitHub Copilot chatmodes and prompts based on the current repository context, including a structured process for fetching available chatmodes/prompts, scanning local files, and presenting options with rationale. - Developed a prompt for updating Azure Verified Modules (AVM) in Bicep files, detailing the process for scanning, checking for updates, validating, and handling breaking changes. - Implemented a prompt for updating implementation plans with new requirements, ensuring machine-readable output and adherence to a strict template. - Added a prompt for updating the llms.txt file to reflect changes in documentation or specifications, focusing on compliance with the llmstxt specification. - Created a prompt for updating markdown file indices with files from specified folders, including options for table structures and update strategies. - Developed a prompt for updating object-oriented component documentation, following industry best practices and ensuring alignment with current implementations. - Added a prompt for updating specification files, emphasizing clarity, structure, and compliance with established documentation standards. * CHANGE: Update implementation plan prompt formatting - Renamed prompt title for clarity. - Added spacing for improved readability. - Enhanced structure to ensure compliance with template validation rules. * CHANGE: Fix typo in .NET best practices prompt - Corrected "soltion" to "solution" in the prompt description.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
GitHub
parent
4daef65892
commit
e1c7c7a50e
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
mode: 'agent'
|
||||
description: 'Create GitHub Issues from implementation plan phases using feature_request.yml or chore_request.yml templates.'
|
||||
tools: ['codebase', 'search', 'github', 'create_issue', 'search_issues', 'update_issue']
|
||||
---
|
||||
# Create GitHub Issue from Implementation Plan
|
||||
|
||||
Create GitHub Issues for the implementation plan at `${file}`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process
|
||||
|
||||
1. Analyze plan file to identify phases
|
||||
2. Check existing issues using `search_issues`
|
||||
3. Create new issue per phase using `create_issue` or update existing with `update_issue`
|
||||
4. Use `feature_request.yml` or `chore_request.yml` templates (fallback to default)
|
||||
|
||||
## Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
- One issue per implementation phase
|
||||
- Clear, structured titles and descriptions
|
||||
- Include only changes required by the plan
|
||||
- Verify against existing issues before creation
|
||||
|
||||
## Issue Content
|
||||
|
||||
- Title: Phase name from implementation plan
|
||||
- Description: Phase details, requirements, and context
|
||||
- Labels: Appropriate for issue type (feature/chore)
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user